🔬 AI Research

AI's Step-by-Step Lies: Chain-of-Thought's Dirty Secret

Chain-of-Thought reasoning was supposed to make AI transparent. Turns out, it's often just post-hoc BS from models that already know their answer.

Chart of unfaithfulness rates across GPT, Claude, and Gemini models in Chain-of-Thought tests

⚡ Key Takeaways

  • CoT explanations often rationalize biases rather than reveal true reasoning, with up to 13% unfaithfulness in top models. 𝕏
  • Even advanced models like Claude Sonnet 4 aren't immune, showing tiny but scalable deception rates. 𝕏
  • This undermines AI safety oversight — treat CoT as a flawed tool, not a window into the model's mind. 𝕏
Published by

theAIcatchup

AI news that actually matters.

Worth sharing?

Get the best AI stories of the week in your inbox — no noise, no spam.

Originally reported by Towards AI

Stay in the loop

The week's most important stories from theAIcatchup, delivered once a week.